Flu Shot Fear

Posted By: Larry Fedoruk · 10/27/2012 1:41:00 PM

Are you a flu shot person? I generally am not, and not because I fear them or buy into the hype of untold dangers inherent within them. I believe vaccines are about the most benign things you can put into your body, that is to say, even if they don't work, what harm can they do?

I don't like how flu shots are promoted at the work place now in the guise of good health, when really it's all about you not missing work and costing your employer a great deal of money. I can't bank my sick days or cash them in at the end of my tenure like some lucky unionized workers, so I almost look forward to that 3-5 day winter holiday known as flu season, where I can sit at home in an over-the-counter medicated daze and watch movies.

KNOW YOUR FLU SHOTS

It is somewhat disturbing that our own federal government has asked Novartis to stop distibuting Fluad and Agriflu (what unfortunate names) vaccines while they investigate reports of tiny clumps of virus particles in some batches. In Saskatchewan they have halted flu clinics for the time being. Several European countries (Italy, Germany, Switzerland) have done the same.

NOTE: Novartis supplies about 20% of Canada's flu vaccines, GlaxoSmithKline supplies most of the rest. Fluad is licensed for people 65 and older. Most say that this “clumping” is not uncommon and does not affect health or effecacy.

What this tells me that you must become a smart consumer on flu shots just like anything else. This year drugstores offer them as well. Ask for the brand, ask about clumping, and ask about the conditions of administration, ie, is everyone confident no outside contaminants are part of that needle going into your forearm. OR, ask at the drugstore if you can drop “trou” and take it in the butt cheek. (Just kidding on that last one.)

There is no “dangerous” influenza strain so far that we have heard of for this season, and everyone should make their own decision on flu shots. However, if you do get one, be a wise consumer and know the whole story. LEAVE COMMENTS.

For other Larry Fedoruk blogs and features, click here.

Leave a comment:

showing all comments · Subscribe to comments
  1. julian posted on 10/28/2012 12:42 PM
    You say, "I believe vaccines are about the most benign things you can put into your body, that is to say, even if they don't work, what harm can they do?"

    If you looked up the ingredients of the vaccine (found in the pharmaceutical insert in each box of serum and the Physician's Desk Reference--hard copy or online version), then looked up the chemical profile of those ingredients (located online through the Environmental Protection Agency), you would see that vaccines are far from benign and can do harm.

    The most concerning ingredient is MF59C.1. -- an adjuvant composed of squalene, polysorbate 80, and sorbitan trioleate in citrate buffer, an oil-in-water emulsion. It has been known for decades that Squalene causes severe autoimmune diseases in lab animals. UCLA Medical School showed that few oils were more effective at causing the animal versions of arthritis and multiple sclerosis than squalene. In 1999, immunologist Dr. Johnny Lorentzen found that on injection, an “otherwise benign molecule like squalene can stimulate a self-destructive immune response.” Other research shows that squalene is the experimental anthrax vaccine ingredient that caused devastating autoimmune diseases and deaths for many Gulf War veterans. There’s a “close match between the squalene-induced diseases in animals and those observed in humans injected with this oil: rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus.”

    FLUAD also contains other ingredients used in the manufacturing process, some of which could be problematic: sodium and potassium chloride, potassium dihydrogen phosphate, disodium phosphate dehydrate, magnesium chloride hexahydrate, calcium chloride dehydrate, neomycin, kanamycin, residual egg protein, formaldehyde, cetyltrimethylammonium bromide and barium.

    The May 31, 2011 FLUAD ‘Prescribing Information’ monograph by Novartis Pharmaceutical Canada Inc. warns, “FLUAD has not been evaluated for…carcinogenic or mutagenic potential.” It also admits that no studies have been done to evaluate possible harmful drug interactions with FLUAD.

    Numerous post marketing adverse events involving the immune system, blood, skin and nervous system have been reported.

    I TOTALLY agree with you that the public should know the whole story. This is the only way one can make a truly informed decision. Doctors/vaccine-givers have only the information provided by the pharma companies that want their product pushed, so one needs to do their research in order to know the whole story..
  2. Larry Fedoruk posted on 10/28/2012 04:08 PM
    I learned a lot here Julian. Thx for the comment.
  3. SonyaG posted on 10/29/2012 02:01 PM
    I am one of "those" people, who just have this awful foreboding feeling about the flu shot. I have never been able to bring my self or subject my children to it. I too have learned a lot here today. Thank you for essentially proving what my subconscious already knew and what I was too lazy to research my self.
  4. TaraF posted on 10/29/2012 08:14 PM
    I haven't had the flu shot in over 15 years and oddly enough I have not had the flu in that time either, but many people I know that get the flu shot on a yearly basis have got the flu several times. I'm currently arguing with my Family Physician and Oncologist over receiving the Flu & Pneumonia shot of which both I refuse to get. I have always been of the mindset that we need to build up our own natural immunities to things, diet, exercise and common sense can protect you from the flu more than the shot. That is just my $0.02 however.
  5. Larry Fedoruk posted on 10/29/2012 09:43 PM
    Thank you Sonya. Also Tara, your $0.02 is always appreciated. You know typewriters used to have the cents symbol. Would it kill modern keyboards to have the same??
showing all comments
Programming1

Twitter